| From: | David Bateman |
| Date: | 24 May 2001 at 16:27:39 |
| Subject: | Re: GCC |
Hello Matt
On 24-May-01, you wrote:
> Hello David
>
> On 24-May-0, you wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i am downloading the gcc-2.95.3-bin.tgz, is this the correct one ?
>
> Yes.
>
>> i saw a gcc-2.95.1-bin020.tgz, is this an older version or an 020+
>> version of the compiler ?
>
> An older version yes. I believe the 2.95.3 compile is 020+ only. If it
> doesn't include the binaries for the processor you want, download the
> source code and recompile for 68060 or whatever - I doubt you'll see much
> difference.
>
> If you can run MorphOS, you may want to get the MorphOS native version
> of 2.95.3 as well (http://www.morphos.de)
>
not at that stage of C, although i do run mos (see my sig).
i did 6 months of C about 5/6 years ago, i wanna get back into it as i
remember enjoying it. I did as part of a "training for work" scheme, 5 days
a week 9am-5pm coding COBOL and then C for six months.
i remember little bits of C, hopefully it'll come flooding back soon...
> Thanks
Regards
EZTower/Amiga A1200
OS3.9/MorphOS/Linux(2.2.10 kernel)/MUIPPC
64Mb/PPC 603e(200/040)
2.1Gb HD/8x CD-ROM/PortJnr/USR 56k/250MB ZIP
17" SVGA/BVisionPPC/CGX v4.2(pre 8)
He who hesitates is a damned fool.
-- Mae West
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/